Yvette Cooper has come to Keir Starmer’s defense amid rising discontent within the Labour Party over the controversy involving Peter Mandelson. The Foreign Secretary, who engaged in urgent discussions with the Prime Minister following the exposure of emails from the US Ambassador related to Jeffrey Epstein, affirmed the decision to dismiss Mandelson. However, doubts persist regarding his initial appointment last year. Labour backbencher Clive Lewis publicly criticized the Prime Minister, suggesting incompetence and highlighting a sense of unease among MPs.
During a visit to Kyiv, Ukraine, Ms. Cooper addressed inquiries about Lord Mandelson’s appointment, emphasizing that new information led to the decision due to factors unknown at the time of his selection. She stressed the importance of focusing on ongoing diplomatic efforts under the Prime Minister’s leadership, citing her discussions with President Zelensky as an example.
In response to questions about any concerns raised prior to Lord Mandelson’s appointment, Ms. Cooper reiterated that the decision was based on the information available at the time and justified by subsequent revelations. Meanwhile, MP Clive Lewis expressed apprehension over the direction of the Labour Party, pointing out the looming threat posed by Nigel Farage’s popularity.
Earlier statements by Labour frontbencher Douglas Alexander defended Mandelson’s selection as a response to the unconventional nature of the US administration. Despite expressing disgust over Mandelson’s correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein, Alexander acknowledged Mandelson’s effectiveness as a diplomat with unique attributes suited for the role.
In light of recent events, Downing Street affirmed confidence in the Prime Minister’s team, dismissing concerns about Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney’s involvement in Mandelson’s appointment. The SNP called for Mandelson to be stripped of his peerage through an early day motion, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency in the aftermath of the controversy.
As scrutiny intensifies, questions surrounding Starmer’s judgement and leadership have come to the forefront, placing additional pressure on the Prime Minister to address lingering uncertainties and uphold accountability in the face of ongoing revelations.